Protecting Consumers. The Consumer Protection Division of the Illinois Attorney General’s office may be able to help if you’ve been victimized by fraud, deception, or unfair methods of competition.

FILING A CONSUMER ISSUE

The Consumer Protection Division of the Illinois Attorney General’s office may be able to help if you’ve been victimized by fraud, deception, or unfair methods of competition. Although our solicitors cannot express a person in case, our mediation system might have the ability to direct you towards resolving disputes or complaints. Promptness to make a grievance decreases the chance that a fly-by-night operator will go, keep city, or walk out company before customers can gain help.

Customers can file a grievance online or submit a customer issue type to your Attorney General’s workplace into the mail or perhaps in individual. Complaint kinds may be downloaded and printed in the links below. To make sure that your type is prepared effortlessly, very carefully review the shape before publishing it to guarantee you provide all the information required, including documentation that is supporting. The Attorney General’s workplace does not need you offer your Social Security quantity or information as to your citizenship status so that you can register a customer problem.

The details you distribute would be utilized by solicitors, detectives, along with other people in the Attorney General’s staff taking part in holding out of the functions, programs, and obligations of this Illinois Attorney General.

It is necessary that your particular customer issue is complete and therefore you offer copies of any supporting paperwork to the workplace. We shall deliver your issue into the ongoing party with that you’ve a dispute unless you advise this workplace never to achieve this. These records can also be distributed to other enforcement that is governmental in charge of customer security as well as other regulations.

Complaint kinds are public information, which are susceptible to the Freedom of Information Act similar to other records that are public. Whenever we get a ask for copies of documents offering your problem, we possibly may have to offer a copy of one’s grievance to your requestor. Information that will reveal your identification being a complainant is, nonetheless, exempt from disclosure and will also be deleted from copies we offer, enabling the requestor to see your grievance without compromising your privacy.

NOTICE: Our online problem portal is presently down. It is possible to submit a problem to the workplace by printing the problem kind from our web site. Printable kinds can be found below.

Fill in and print a consumer issue type below. We suggest getting the most recent Adobe Acrobat Reader for viewing/downloading these complaint that is PDF.

Please add your complete target and phone quantity plus the company’ target and contact number. Mail the issue kind and just about every other documents that are relevant:

NOTE:

If you go through difficulties with starting a consumer grievance type we suggest that you conserve the PDF kind to your hard disk drive, then fill in and print from your own Computer. Stick to the guidelines for getting a complaint type below:

1. Click the PDF complaint form link with all the RIGHT mouse switch 2. Select “conserve Target As. ” (web browser) OR “Save Link As. ” (Firefox and Netscape) 3. choose the folder to that you simply wish to save yourself the PDF problem form.

At one of the hotline numbers below so we can be of more assistance if you have any are experiencing any difficulty with the consumer complaint online form or downloadable pdf forms, please contact us.

CUSTOMER FRAUD HOTLINES:

Inside the judgment, Justice Chan determined that Mr Teo’s form of activities had been more likely.

The judge noted that Mr Kwan had granted cash that is post-dated for an overall total amount that matched the full total loan quantum. This pointed towards a meant repayment or an assurance of payment, he stated.

Justice Chan added that Mr Kwan’s form of activities had been contradicted by their police that is own report Mr Teo in June 2018. When you look at the report, he claimed that he received a complete of $800,000 from Mr Teo.

Justice Chan accepted Mr Teo’s description for the written text communications – he ended up being just acting being a middleman between Mr Kwan together with Malaysian loan sharks.

In a single message, Mr Teo told Mr Kwan: “Bro consider it. I am placing my throat (sic) for you personally till now.”

The judge also discovered that Mr Kwan had neglected to show that any repayments had been made by him to Mr Teo.